Comments on: My Field Trip To The Supreme Court

By: Mr. Feld Goes to DC – Again – To Talk About Innovation

Mr. Feld Goes to DC – Again – To Talk About Innovation — Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:23:33 +0000

[...] innovation. I’ve been here three times in the past year – the first time was to hear Bilski at the Supreme Court in November and then I was back in March to talk about and promote the Startup [...]

By: Software Patent Absurdity

Software Patent Absurdity — Thu, 06 May 2010 17:29:37 +0000

[...] film is based on a series of interviews conducted during the Supreme Court’s review of in re Bilski (which I attended in person) — a case that could have profound implications for the patenting of software. It’s really [...]

By: replcia handbags

replcia handbags — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:18:44 +0000

So, some tip about this issue are welcome and really sorry if my question is very simple. Thanks in advance
Thanks again for your help. Your site contain a many useful information.

By: SEO Manchester

SEO Manchester — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:09:51 +0000

Hail the justices of today such as those in Manchester

By: @TheNowMall

@TheNowMall — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:01:19 +0000

Oops :-/ I have updated my profile on my blog to better reflect our experience with patents for our business method and technology for both our virtual call center (Willow, now Arise.com) and rapid order fulfillment (TheNowMall.com). My partner, Richard Cherry, also has numerous other patents for products used worldwide (plastic shipping containers, food & beverage processing equipment, etc.) all of which stemmed from solving seemingly insurmountable challenges for clients.

By: Brad Feld

Brad Feld — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:02:06 +0000

Is there a particular article on your blog that you are pointing to? I took a look and didn’t see anything.

By: @TheNowMall

@TheNowMall — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:59:01 +0000

Having business method & software patents, we see them as benchmarks, not firewalls to innovation..http://thenowmall.blogspot.com

By: Patent Baristas » Supreme Court Ponders Hypotheticals In Bilski

Patent Baristas » Supreme Court Ponders Hypotheticals In Bilski — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:31:04 +0000

[...] Feld Thoughts (My Field Trip To The Supreme Court) [...]

By: Ben K

Ben K — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:00:04 +0000

The Government's efforts to steer away from software and toward a "technical arts test" is easy to explain: Dave Kappos, the new head of the Patent Office, is the former head of IBM's intellectual property division. His (and, by crazy coincidence, IBM's) position is that anything in the technical arts (e.g., anything IBM does) should be patentable, and anything outside the technical arts, like business methods, should not be. This is the line that the Government presented in the case. This line of argument was basically absent in Government filings about Bilski pre-appointment of Kappos.

By: Bill Mosby

Bill Mosby — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:51:40 +0000

Good to hear how competent the Justices are. Given the volume of work they do, they get a lot of practice.