<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s The Little Things &#8211; Or Why Windows Mobile Contact Search Sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EquiPro</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-44945</link>
		<dc:creator>EquiPro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html#comment-44945</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m losing it.  I don&#039;t understand why I have to choose to locate a contact on my WinMo 6.1 device by EITHER &quot;name&quot; or &quot;company&quot;.  Really??  REALLY???  Sometimes I can remember someone&#039;s name or part thereof, AND sometimes I can sort of remember their company name or part thereof.  If I have to choose to look them up by either one OR the other, but not both simultaneously, what will happen is what often happens:  I can&#039;t find them easily.  Ridiculous.  Absolutely ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m losing it.  I don&#039;t understand why I have to choose to locate a contact on my WinMo 6.1 device by EITHER &#8220;name&#8221; or &#8220;company&#8221;.  Really??  REALLY???  Sometimes I can remember someone&#039;s name or part thereof, AND sometimes I can sort of remember their company name or part thereof.  If I have to choose to look them up by either one OR the other, but not both simultaneously, what will happen is what often happens:  I can&#039;t find them easily.  Ridiculous.  Absolutely ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EquiPro</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-40119</link>
		<dc:creator>EquiPro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html#comment-40119</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m losing it.  I don&#039;t understand why I have to choose to locate a contact on my WinMo 6.1 device by EITHER &quot;name&quot; or &quot;company&quot;.  Really??  REALLY???  Sometimes I can remember someone&#039;s name or part thereof, AND sometimes I can sort of remember their company name or part thereof.  If I have to choose to look them up by either one OR the other, but not both simultaneously, what will happen is what often happens:  I can&#039;t find them easily.  Ridiculous.  Absolutely ridiculous. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m losing it.  I don&#039;t understand why I have to choose to locate a contact on my WinMo 6.1 device by EITHER &quot;name&quot; or &quot;company&quot;.  Really??  REALLY???  Sometimes I can remember someone&#039;s name or part thereof, AND sometimes I can sort of remember their company name or part thereof.  If I have to choose to look them up by either one OR the other, but not both simultaneously, what will happen is what often happens:  I can&#039;t find them easily.  Ridiculous.  Absolutely ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-44949</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html#comment-44949</guid>
		<description>Damn, that&#039;s crazy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, that&#039;s crazy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-24571</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html#comment-24571</guid>
		<description>Damn, that&#039;s crazy... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, that&#039;s crazy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-44948</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html#comment-44948</guid>
		<description>Damn, that&#039;s crazy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, that&#039;s crazy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-24570</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html#comment-24570</guid>
		<description>Damn, that&#039;s crazy... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, that&#039;s crazy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostdummy</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-44944</link>
		<dc:creator>lostdummy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html#comment-44944</guid>
		<description>I must agree with that &quot;little things&quot; part - since now we are in 2010 (over 1 year after this post), past WM6.5, and I still had problem to do such basic elementary thing as search my contacts by (part of) number.

That &quot;minus&quot; to Windows Mobile is offset by how easy it is to &quot;do it yourself&quot; - with any c# background, it was easy to write my own contact search/dialer. BUT that should not be required in well designed UI , especially not for such basic usability scenarios.

On a side note, one issue that I encountered while making that small contact program could maybe explain your 30sec searches of only few thousands contacts - since my initial solution had slow search for only 400 contacts.

It turns out that it is not search algorithm that is problem, but very slow response time for Windows Mobile API call to retrieve single contact info. Just by initially loading all those contacts in local program memory made searches instant, even using dumb search algorithm (at a price of initial 20sec load of all contacts).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree with that &#8220;little things&#8221; part &#8211; since now we are in 2010 (over 1 year after this post), past WM6.5, and I still had problem to do such basic elementary thing as search my contacts by (part of) number.</p>
<p>That &#8220;minus&#8221; to Windows Mobile is offset by how easy it is to &#8220;do it yourself&#8221; &#8211; with any c# background, it was easy to write my own contact search/dialer. BUT that should not be required in well designed UI , especially not for such basic usability scenarios.</p>
<p>On a side note, one issue that I encountered while making that small contact program could maybe explain your 30sec searches of only few thousands contacts &#8211; since my initial solution had slow search for only 400 contacts.</p>
<p>It turns out that it is not search algorithm that is problem, but very slow response time for Windows Mobile API call to retrieve single contact info. Just by initially loading all those contacts in local program memory made searches instant, even using dumb search algorithm (at a price of initial 20sec load of all contacts).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lostdummy</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-30681</link>
		<dc:creator>lostdummy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html#comment-30681</guid>
		<description>I must agree with that &quot;little things&quot; part - since now we are in 2010 (over 1 year after this post), past WM6.5, and I still had problem to do such basic elementary thing as search my contacts by (part of) number. 
 
That &quot;minus&quot; to Windows Mobile is offset by how easy it is to &quot;do it yourself&quot; - with any c# background, it was easy to write my own contact search/dialer. BUT that should not be required in well designed UI , especially not for such basic usability scenarios. 
 
On a side note, one issue that I encountered while making that small contact program could maybe explain your 30sec searches of only few thousands contacts - since my initial solution had slow search for only 400 contacts. 
 
It turns out that it is not search algorithm that is problem, but very slow response time for Windows Mobile API call to retrieve single contact info. Just by initially loading all those contacts in local program memory made searches instant, even using dumb search algorithm (at a price of initial 20sec load of all contacts).  
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must agree with that &quot;little things&quot; part &#8211; since now we are in 2010 (over 1 year after this post), past WM6.5, and I still had problem to do such basic elementary thing as search my contacts by (part of) number. </p>
<p>That &quot;minus&quot; to Windows Mobile is offset by how easy it is to &quot;do it yourself&quot; &#8211; with any c# background, it was easy to write my own contact search/dialer. BUT that should not be required in well designed UI , especially not for such basic usability scenarios. </p>
<p>On a side note, one issue that I encountered while making that small contact program could maybe explain your 30sec searches of only few thousands contacts &#8211; since my initial solution had slow search for only 400 contacts. </p>
<p>It turns out that it is not search algorithm that is problem, but very slow response time for Windows Mobile API call to retrieve single contact info. Just by initially loading all those contacts in local program memory made searches instant, even using dumb search algorithm (at a price of initial 20sec load of all contacts).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-9911</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html#comment-9911</guid>
		<description>Hmm, that&#039;s not a good thing to have to put up with at all. . . 
 
Have you read about Google&#039;s OS for mobile devices (a.k.a. Android) much? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, that&#039;s not a good thing to have to put up with at all. . . </p>
<p>Have you read about Google&#039;s OS for mobile devices (a.k.a. Android) much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve_bergs2127</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html/comment-page-1#comment-9913</link>
		<dc:creator>steve_bergs2127</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/its-the-little-things-or-why-windows-mobile-contact-search-sucks.html#comment-9913</guid>
		<description>One quibble and, I hope, a point: the performance of a search algorithm isn&#039;t a UI design issue - it&#039;s an algorithm issue.  If they fixed the problem, the keystrokes you type wouldn&#039;t change at all - only the speed of the search. 
 
At one software company I worked at, I was told that &quot;usability doesn&#039;t sell software&quot; and that our CEO didn&#039;t &quot;believe in usability.&quot;   It may well be true that usability doesn&#039;t generate sales.  When I worked for &quot;big consulting co,&quot; we would evaluate software based upon a prioritized list of client-required features.  I can&#039;t recall that &quot;easy to use&quot; was ever one of them.  On the other hand, the software CEO worried a lot about adoption and penetration into our customers&#039; organizations.  I suspect that usability would have a big impact on that. 
 
Every engineer who designs anything to be used by another human being should be forced to read (at a bare minimum) Donald Norman&#039;s &quot;The Design of Everyday Things&quot; (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Design-Everyday-Things-Donald-Norman/dp/0385267746). &quot;&gt;http://www.amazon.com/Design-Everyday-Things-Dona...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One quibble and, I hope, a point: the performance of a search algorithm isn&#039;t a UI design issue &#8211; it&#039;s an algorithm issue.  If they fixed the problem, the keystrokes you type wouldn&#039;t change at all &#8211; only the speed of the search. </p>
<p>At one software company I worked at, I was told that &quot;usability doesn&#039;t sell software&quot; and that our CEO didn&#039;t &quot;believe in usability.&quot;   It may well be true that usability doesn&#039;t generate sales.  When I worked for &quot;big consulting co,&quot; we would evaluate software based upon a prioritized list of client-required features.  I can&#039;t recall that &quot;easy to use&quot; was ever one of them.  On the other hand, the software CEO worried a lot about adoption and penetration into our customers&#039; organizations.  I suspect that usability would have a big impact on that. </p>
<p>Every engineer who designs anything to be used by another human being should be forced to read (at a bare minimum) Donald Norman&#039;s &quot;The Design of Everyday Things&quot; (see <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Design-Everyday-Things-Donald-Norman/dp/0385267746). ">http://www.amazon.com/Design-Everyday-Things-Dona&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache 0.8.9.1 -->
