<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boulder #2 CyberCity in the US</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:06:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bfeld</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-8536</link>
		<dc:creator>bfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html#comment-8536</guid>
		<description>That is probably true and a good / interesting observation.  Just more evidence that how you cluster the data causes the lists to tell you what you want them to. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is probably true and a good / interesting observation.  Just more evidence that how you cluster the data causes the lists to tell you what you want them to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bfeld</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-8546</link>
		<dc:creator>bfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html#comment-8546</guid>
		<description>via email from a blog reader: &quot;Actually, clustering San Jose and &quot;silicon valley&quot; together is probably that only thing that prevents this list from looking like a list of bay-area cities south of San Mateo.  Where do you think boulder would rank if Mountain View, Palo Alto, Sunnyvale, Cupertino and Menlo Park were counted as individual cities in addition to San Jose?  It would probably move from 2nd to 6th...&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>via email from a blog reader: &quot;Actually, clustering San Jose and &quot;silicon valley&quot; together is probably that only thing that prevents this list from looking like a list of bay-area cities south of San Mateo.  Where do you think boulder would rank if Mountain View, Palo Alto, Sunnyvale, Cupertino and Menlo Park were counted as individual cities in addition to San Jose?  It would probably move from 2nd to 6th&#8230;&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach_Beauvais</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-8551</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach_Beauvais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html#comment-8551</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an impressive city, isn&#039;t it? I&#039;ve heard the wireless is brilliant too. If only there was a way to replicate the heady mixture of a laid-back coffee-culture, eco-friendliness and technological savvy from Boulder to the lovely hills of Shropshire, especially the coffee and tech... Oh well. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s an impressive city, isn&#039;t it? I&#039;ve heard the wireless is brilliant too. If only there was a way to replicate the heady mixture of a laid-back coffee-culture, eco-friendliness and technological savvy from Boulder to the lovely hills of Shropshire, especially the coffee and tech&#8230; Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Place</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-8540</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Place</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html#comment-8540</guid>
		<description>And Huntsville only counts because in that town there&#039;s NASA and nothing else. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Huntsville only counts because in that town there&#039;s NASA and nothing else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve_bergs2127</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-8558</link>
		<dc:creator>steve_bergs2127</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html#comment-8558</guid>
		<description>Interesting that the Boston area didn&#039;t make the list. Maybe they couldn&#039;t come up with a Route 128 analog to Silicon Valley. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that the Boston area didn&#039;t make the list. Maybe they couldn&#039;t come up with a Route 128 analog to Silicon Valley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach_Beauvais</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-44904</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach_Beauvais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html#comment-44904</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an impressive city, isn&#039;t it? I&#039;ve heard the wireless is brilliant too. If only there was a way to replicate the heady mixture of a laid-back coffee-culture, eco-friendliness and technological savvy from Boulder to the lovely hills of Shropshire, especially the coffee and tech... Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s an impressive city, isn&#039;t it? I&#039;ve heard the wireless is brilliant too. If only there was a way to replicate the heady mixture of a laid-back coffee-culture, eco-friendliness and technological savvy from Boulder to the lovely hills of Shropshire, especially the coffee and tech&#8230; Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Feld</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-44905</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Feld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html#comment-44905</guid>
		<description>That is probably true and a good / interesting observation.  Just more evidence that how you cluster the data causes the lists to tell you what you want them to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is probably true and a good / interesting observation.  Just more evidence that how you cluster the data causes the lists to tell you what you want them to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Feld</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-44903</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Feld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html#comment-44903</guid>
		<description>via email from a blog reader: &quot;Actually, clustering San Jose and &quot;silicon valley&quot; together is probably that only thing that prevents this list from looking like a list of bay-area cities south of San Mateo.  Where do you think boulder would rank if Mountain View, Palo Alto, Sunnyvale, Cupertino and Menlo Park were counted as individual cities in addition to San Jose?  It would probably move from 2nd to 6th...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>via email from a blog reader: &#8220;Actually, clustering San Jose and &#8220;silicon valley&#8221; together is probably that only thing that prevents this list from looking like a list of bay-area cities south of San Mateo.  Where do you think boulder would rank if Mountain View, Palo Alto, Sunnyvale, Cupertino and Menlo Park were counted as individual cities in addition to San Jose?  It would probably move from 2nd to 6th&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bergstein</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-44902</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bergstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html#comment-44902</guid>
		<description>Interesting that the Boston area didn&#039;t make the list. Maybe they couldn&#039;t come up with a Route 128 analog to Silicon Valley.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that the Boston area didn&#039;t make the list. Maybe they couldn&#039;t come up with a Route 128 analog to Silicon Valley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Place</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html/comment-page-1#comment-44901</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Place</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2008/06/boulder-2-cybercity-in-the-us.html#comment-44901</guid>
		<description>And Huntsville only counts because in that town there&#039;s NASA and nothing else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Huntsville only counts because in that town there&#039;s NASA and nothing else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache 0.8.9.1 -->
