So here's the perception, any one of which could be true.

1. Intense Debate is censoring content. You take this off the table.

2. The Daily Camera is censoring content. They haven't done so in the past except when posts were "hateful", obscene, or created a legal liability for the paper. The volume of posts removed in the past was fairly low… with fewer posts removed per week than people are complaining about disappearing per day now.

3. The software is dropping posts from the pages where the posts were made (but retaining the content in the user's Profile page).

I'm betting on #3, but the audience seems split about 50/50 that it's bugs vs censorship on either your part or the part of the newspaper. You can't afford #1 or #3, the paper can't afford any of them to persist.