<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Email APIs Are Coming &#8211; But Where Are They?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/11/the-email-apis-are-coming-but-where-are-they.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/11/the-email-apis-are-coming-but-where-are-they.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:43:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: deva_hazari2084</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/11/the-email-apis-are-coming-but-where-are-they.html/comment-page-1#comment-6819</link>
		<dc:creator>deva_hazari2084</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1912#comment-6819</guid>
		<description>Brad, rather than &quot;he suggests the issue isn&#8217;t the inbox, but the address book&quot; I&#039;d say that I suggest (huh?!) the issue most of those posts talked about is the address book, but the real issue is much broader - precisely what you and others are now touching on regarding messaging.  I added 4 A&#039;s to the 3 I&#039;s here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emaildashboard.com/2007/11/the-four-as-of.html &quot;&gt;http://www.emaildashboard.com/2007/11/the-four-as...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Also, the &quot;Loading&quot; wait for IntenseDebate is annoying. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad, rather than &quot;he suggests the issue isn&rsquo;t the inbox, but the address book&quot; I&#039;d say that I suggest (huh?!) the issue most of those posts talked about is the address book, but the real issue is much broader &#8211; precisely what you and others are now touching on regarding messaging.  I added 4 A&#039;s to the 3 I&#039;s here: <a href="http://www.emaildashboard.com/2007/11/the-four-as-of.html "></a><a href="http://www.emaildashboard.com/2007/11/the-four-as.." rel="nofollow">http://www.emaildashboard.com/2007/11/the-four-as..</a>.</p>
<p>Also, the &quot;Loading&quot; wait for IntenseDebate is annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert960</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/11/the-email-apis-are-coming-but-where-are-they.html/comment-page-1#comment-6830</link>
		<dc:creator>robert960</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1912#comment-6830</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/11/the-social-grap.html#comment-14269 &quot;&gt;http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/11/the-social-grap...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.radicati.com/brochure.asp?id=477 &quot;&gt;http://www.radicati.com/brochure.asp?id=477 &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Howard Lindzon had some input on Fred&#039;s blog. I tend to agree with his assessment that it&#039;s the leverage of the social graph that is most important here. No matter what your application is (i.e. e-mail relevancy), you need to leverage the social graph. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m mostly interested in the application of this concept in the enterprise sector (no news there). With spending in the &quot;enterprise social software&quot; sector expected to reach $3.3B by 2011, at least according to Radicati, there appears to be a real need to leverage the social graph. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Also, I agree with the &quot;messaging not e-mail&quot; statement. While e-mail is the current standard in the enterprise, there&#039;s no reason to believe instant messaging, blogs, and intra-service communication won&#039;t see just as much (or more) adoption. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/11/the-social-grap.html#comment-14269 "></a><a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/11/the-social-grap.." rel="nofollow">http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2007/11/the-social-grap..</a>.<br />
<a href="http://www.radicati.com/brochure.asp?id=477 "></a><a href="http://www.radicati.com/brochure.asp?id=477" rel="nofollow">http://www.radicati.com/brochure.asp?id=477</a> </p>
<p>Howard Lindzon had some input on Fred&#039;s blog. I tend to agree with his assessment that it&#039;s the leverage of the social graph that is most important here. No matter what your application is (i.e. e-mail relevancy), you need to leverage the social graph. </p>
<p>I&#039;m mostly interested in the application of this concept in the enterprise sector (no news there). With spending in the &quot;enterprise social software&quot; sector expected to reach $3.3B by 2011, at least according to Radicati, there appears to be a real need to leverage the social graph. </p>
<p>Also, I agree with the &quot;messaging not e-mail&quot; statement. While e-mail is the current standard in the enterprise, there&#039;s no reason to believe instant messaging, blogs, and intra-service communication won&#039;t see just as much (or more) adoption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
