<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That&#8217;s A Good Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/thats-a-good-question.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/thats-a-good-question.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:06:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/thats-a-good-question.html/comment-page-1#comment-12640</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1612#comment-12640</guid>
		<description>According to despair.com, there are no stupid questions, only inquisitive idiots. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to despair.com, there are no stupid questions, only inquisitive idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deepb</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/thats-a-good-question.html/comment-page-1#comment-4728</link>
		<dc:creator>deepb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1612#comment-4728</guid>
		<description>It &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; annoying to hear those phrases from someone routinely or without good reason, but I believe they have legitimate uses as well.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For example, I use &#039;honestly..&#039; when I&#039;m about to say something that might not be 100% politically correct, or providing a &lt;i&gt;solicited&lt;/i&gt; personal opinion that is unfavorable to the person I&#039;m talking to (e.g., Him: &quot;Do you like my new haircut?&quot;  Me: &quot;Honestly.. no.&quot;).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I used to work with a guy who overused the word &#039;basically&#039;.  Basically, he used it as the first word of every sentence, and basically, sometimes even more frequently.  So basically, that got pretty annoying.  Basically, of course.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It <i>is</i> annoying to hear those phrases from someone routinely or without good reason, but I believe they have legitimate uses as well.</p>
<p>For example, I use &#8216;honestly..&#8217; when I&#8217;m about to say something that might not be 100% politically correct, or providing a <i>solicited</i> personal opinion that is unfavorable to the person I&#8217;m talking to (e.g., Him: &#8220;Do you like my new haircut?&#8221;  Me: &#8220;Honestly.. no.&#8221;).</p>
<p>I used to work with a guy who overused the word &#8216;basically&#8217;.  Basically, he used it as the first word of every sentence, and basically, sometimes even more frequently.  So basically, that got pretty annoying.  Basically, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thanh Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/thats-a-good-question.html/comment-page-1#comment-4727</link>
		<dc:creator>Thanh Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 05:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1612#comment-4727</guid>
		<description>Personally I think there are more to understand of an answer than just the content or the use of &quot;tics&quot;. Normally we need to put ourselves into the context to get the big picture, then we can get directly to the point.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think there are more to understand of an answer than just the content or the use of &#8220;tics&#8221;. Normally we need to put ourselves into the context to get the big picture, then we can get directly to the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/thats-a-good-question.html/comment-page-1#comment-4726</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 13:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1612#comment-4726</guid>
		<description>This is an area I explored in my own blog, but looking at how entrepreneurs use the phrase &quot;good question&quot; in &lt;a href=&quot;http://venturecyclist.blogspot.com/2006/11/vcvc-good-question.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://venturecyclist.blogspot.com/2006/11/vcvc-good-question.html&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an area I explored in my own blog, but looking at how entrepreneurs use the phrase &#8220;good question&#8221; in <a href="http://venturecyclist.blogspot.com/2006/11/vcvc-good-question.html" rel="nofollow">http://venturecyclist.blogspot.com/2006/11/vcvc-good-question.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/thats-a-good-question.html/comment-page-1#comment-4725</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 08:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1612#comment-4725</guid>
		<description>There are definitely some &quot;verbal tics&quot; that get on my nerves, but I don&#039;t think that simply using one of these automatically makes it annoying.  It all depends on the context.  For example, I found myself saying &quot;that&#039;s a good question&quot; a couple of days ago, in what I believe was a reasonable context.

The situation was that I was answering a series of questions posed to me by a colleague about a project we were working on.  I had been working on it longer, and was more familiar with the subject matter, and he was rather new to the project.  In fact, I actually thought that I knew about everything there was to know about the subject matter and that the conversation was going to be annoying because I would be spending my time covering new ground.

However, after asking a couple of good questions to solidify his understanding of the subject, my colleague asked me a question that I didn&#039;t have an answer for, because I had not previously considered the possibilities implied by his question.  I may have even said &quot;that&#039;s a good question&quot; specifically because I didn&#039;t have an answer, and was buying time to think, as you suggested above.

But I don&#039;t think this is so bad in this case.  I&#039;m basically saying something akin to &quot;Wow, I thought that due to your limited exposure to the subject matter your questions were going to be routine and boring but instead you&#039;ve surprised me by coming up with a question that a) I have not previously considered and b) is worth thinking about.  Good job!&quot; but without spelling all of that out in such detail.  I&#039;m sure the person I was speaking too got the jist of it from the context and my tone and so on.

As an aside, I noticed that I used another phrase that people may find redundant or annoying above when I started a sentence with &quot;In fact, ...&quot;.  Following the logic in the post and some of the comments, some people might suggest that my use of that qualifier suggests that unless my sentences are prefaced with that qualifier (or a similar one) that perhaps I am lying or wrong.

This is not the case, but rather I was just using it to try to keep my writing flowing nicely and indicate that the statement following &quot;in fact&quot; was a further refinement of the preceeding statement.

There are tons of &quot;tics&quot; that people use every day that could certainly be eliminated from their vocabulary or perhaps even the collective vocabulary, but written and verbal communication would get really boring really fast if you rip out all the unnecessary verbiage and force people to always get right to the point.

I realize that no one is advocating eliminating every colloquialism from ever situation, but where do you draw the line?  I think that&#039;s a good question.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are definitely some &#8220;verbal tics&#8221; that get on my nerves, but I don&#8217;t think that simply using one of these automatically makes it annoying.  It all depends on the context.  For example, I found myself saying &#8220;that&#8217;s a good question&#8221; a couple of days ago, in what I believe was a reasonable context.</p>
<p>The situation was that I was answering a series of questions posed to me by a colleague about a project we were working on.  I had been working on it longer, and was more familiar with the subject matter, and he was rather new to the project.  In fact, I actually thought that I knew about everything there was to know about the subject matter and that the conversation was going to be annoying because I would be spending my time covering new ground.</p>
<p>However, after asking a couple of good questions to solidify his understanding of the subject, my colleague asked me a question that I didn&#8217;t have an answer for, because I had not previously considered the possibilities implied by his question.  I may have even said &#8220;that&#8217;s a good question&#8221; specifically because I didn&#8217;t have an answer, and was buying time to think, as you suggested above.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t think this is so bad in this case.  I&#8217;m basically saying something akin to &#8220;Wow, I thought that due to your limited exposure to the subject matter your questions were going to be routine and boring but instead you&#8217;ve surprised me by coming up with a question that a) I have not previously considered and b) is worth thinking about.  Good job!&#8221; but without spelling all of that out in such detail.  I&#8217;m sure the person I was speaking too got the jist of it from the context and my tone and so on.</p>
<p>As an aside, I noticed that I used another phrase that people may find redundant or annoying above when I started a sentence with &#8220;In fact, &#8230;&#8221;.  Following the logic in the post and some of the comments, some people might suggest that my use of that qualifier suggests that unless my sentences are prefaced with that qualifier (or a similar one) that perhaps I am lying or wrong.</p>
<p>This is not the case, but rather I was just using it to try to keep my writing flowing nicely and indicate that the statement following &#8220;in fact&#8221; was a further refinement of the preceeding statement.</p>
<p>There are tons of &#8220;tics&#8221; that people use every day that could certainly be eliminated from their vocabulary or perhaps even the collective vocabulary, but written and verbal communication would get really boring really fast if you rip out all the unnecessary verbiage and force people to always get right to the point.</p>
<p>I realize that no one is advocating eliminating every colloquialism from ever situation, but where do you draw the line?  I think that&#8217;s a good question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/thats-a-good-question.html/comment-page-1#comment-4724</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1612#comment-4724</guid>
		<description>The best use of the word &quot;frankly&quot; was done by dear ol&#039; Rhett!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best use of the word &#8220;frankly&#8221; was done by dear ol&#8217; Rhett!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee J. Cockrell</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/thats-a-good-question.html/comment-page-1#comment-4723</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee J. Cockrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1612#comment-4723</guid>
		<description>When I preface statements with &quot;honestly&quot;, usually I&#039;m about to say something to which the recipient would prefer a different answer than the truth.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I preface statements with &#8220;honestly&#8221;, usually I&#8217;m about to say something to which the recipient would prefer a different answer than the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Yates</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/thats-a-good-question.html/comment-page-1#comment-4722</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Yates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1612#comment-4722</guid>
		<description>All these annoy me, too, and one other: &quot;Frankly&quot; or &quot;If I can be frank.&quot;

In my former life as a reporter at a small town paper, the police used &quot;Code Frank&quot; over the police radio to refer to a dead body. So whenever I hear someone ask if they can be &quot;frank&quot; I always picture them dead.

That cured me of ever accidentally saying that!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All these annoy me, too, and one other: &#8220;Frankly&#8221; or &#8220;If I can be frank.&#8221;</p>
<p>In my former life as a reporter at a small town paper, the police used &#8220;Code Frank&#8221; over the police radio to refer to a dead body. So whenever I hear someone ask if they can be &#8220;frank&#8221; I always picture them dead.</p>
<p>That cured me of ever accidentally saying that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/thats-a-good-question.html/comment-page-1#comment-4721</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1612#comment-4721</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t stand &quot;to be honest with you&quot; or any of the phrases along those lines. I wrote a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.serviceuntitled.com/to-be-honest-with-you/2006/10/30/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; about it in customer service.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t stand &#8220;to be honest with you&#8221; or any of the phrases along those lines. I wrote a <a href="http://www.serviceuntitled.com/to-be-honest-with-you/2006/10/30/" rel="nofollow">post</a> about it in customer service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan RImm-Kaufman</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/thats-a-good-question.html/comment-page-1#comment-4720</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan RImm-Kaufman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1612#comment-4720</guid>
		<description>When &quot;That&#039;s a great question!&quot; is sincere, I think it is quite polite.

When it is insincere, it is grating.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When &#8220;That&#8217;s a great question!&#8221; is sincere, I think it is quite polite.</p>
<p>When it is insincere, it is grating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache 0.8.9.1 -->
