<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Click Your Heals Twice DorthyClick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/click-your-heals-twice-dorthyclick.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/click-your-heals-twice-dorthyclick.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dasher</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/click-your-heals-twice-dorthyclick.html/comment-page-1#comment-4622</link>
		<dc:creator>Dasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 03:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1585#comment-4622</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the explanation Brad.

So it was really $700M net. Wow, they got 75% of it back by selling abacus and the email marketing business. So it is really the remaining 25% ($175K) that returned them $3.1B. That is a big time score.

In hindsight H&amp;F has done an amazing job in evalauating the assets of DC. I am surprised to read that the deal was seen as a risky (or even dumb) at that time. There must have been other dot com assets that were picked up on the cheap 2 to 3 years ago. This only goes to show that the best time to buy is when no one is buying.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation Brad.</p>
<p>So it was really $700M net. Wow, they got 75% of it back by selling abacus and the email marketing business. So it is really the remaining 25% ($175K) that returned them $3.1B. That is a big time score.</p>
<p>In hindsight H&#038;F has done an amazing job in evalauating the assets of DC. I am surprised to read that the deal was seen as a risky (or even dumb) at that time. There must have been other dot com assets that were picked up on the cheap 2 to 3 years ago. This only goes to show that the best time to buy is when no one is buying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Feld</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/click-your-heals-twice-dorthyclick.html/comment-page-1#comment-4621</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Feld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1585#comment-4621</guid>
		<description>Dasher - DoubleClick had cash on their balance sheet (I vaguely remember it being in the $400m+ range.)  So - that effectively can reduce the purchase price since H&amp;F can use DoubleClick&#039;s own cash to buy part of the company.  In addition, H&amp;F could have borrowed the balance of the cash - a 1:1 leverage ratio is very low (they likely could have raised a lot more if they had wanted to - and might have.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dasher &#8211; DoubleClick had cash on their balance sheet (I vaguely remember it being in the $400m+ range.)  So &#8211; that effectively can reduce the purchase price since H&#038;F can use DoubleClick&#8217;s own cash to buy part of the company.  In addition, H&#038;F could have borrowed the balance of the cash &#8211; a 1:1 leverage ratio is very low (they likely could have raised a lot more if they had wanted to &#8211; and might have.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dasher</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/click-your-heals-twice-dorthyclick.html/comment-page-1#comment-4620</link>
		<dc:creator>Dasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1585#comment-4620</guid>
		<description>Brad, I am not too familar with the PE world. Can you please explain how H&amp;F can spend just $330M to fully acquire a company valued at $1.1B? Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I am not very familar with how this stuff works. Thanks.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad, I am not too familar with the PE world. Can you please explain how H&#038;F can spend just $330M to fully acquire a company valued at $1.1B? Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I am not very familar with how this stuff works. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Kemper</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2007/04/click-your-heals-twice-dorthyclick.html/comment-page-1#comment-4619</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Kemper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 00:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1585#comment-4619</guid>
		<description>Hellman &amp; Friedman&#039;s acquisition of Double Click is probably one of the best technology-media buyouts of all time. Not only did the H&amp;F team take a gutsy contrarian bet at the time, as they called the ad cycle perfectly, they seem to have made all the right strategic operating moves along the way by breaking up the business. Kudos.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hellman &#038; Friedman&#8217;s acquisition of Double Click is probably one of the best technology-media buyouts of all time. Not only did the H&#038;F team take a gutsy contrarian bet at the time, as they called the ad cycle perfectly, they seem to have made all the right strategic operating moves along the way by breaking up the business. Kudos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache 0.8.9.1 -->
