Brad's Books and Organizations

Books

Books

Organizations

Organizations

Hi, I’m Brad Feld, a managing director at the Foundry Group who lives in Boulder, Colorado. I invest in software and Internet companies around the US, run marathons and read a lot.

« swipe left for tags/categories

swipe right to go back »

What Does It Take to Scale A Web 2.0 Startup?

Comments (6)

Last year, the meme of “you can start a company for minimal capital” made the rounds.  This is still true.  But – it’s not trivial to scale a company for minimal capital (it’s possible, but an exception, not the norm.)  This meme is starting to make the rounds – Heather Green at BusinessWeek just wrote an article titled Make-or-Break Time For The Net Newbies.

Heather interviewed me for the article.  Since I only do interviews by email, I asked her if I could post our email exchange as further background to the article.  She kindly agreed as long as I waited until the article came out.  Here is the actual interview we did.  The questions Helen asked me are in italics.

Are we seeing companies getting wound down and why? (I.E. Is something deliberate going on rather than just observers making something out of nothing).  This is all totally normal.  There should be plenty of mortality among young, venture backed companies.  If there’s not, something weird is going on.  At this point, there were a lot of Series A investments in “Web 2.0” stuff done in 2006 – those companies are now running out of money and need to raise a Series B.  Some non-trivial percentage of these companies should not be able to raise a Series B for a variety of reasons, including (a) poor performance, (b) overly crowded segment where the companies are “me too” companies, (c) difficulties between management and the investors, and (d) “stuff just didn’t work.”  There’s nothing special going on here – it’s just the normal VC-backed company cycle.
 
Do you think that entrepreneurs and VCs are finding that though it is much much cheaper to start up companies these days, because of the rising competition with more companies getting funded, you now need to put in more money to make your company stand out? Any ballpark estimate of how much more?  It’s much less expensive to get started – that’s been well documented.  However, at some point you have to go from a web-based prototype to a business.  Many of the companies that were acquired by Google and Yahoo in the past 18 months were in this zone and they ended up getting bought before the moment of truth came.  This prompted lots and lots of me too companies – none of which will be bought by Google, Yahoo, or anyone else.  So – once these companies get a prototype up and running (their “beta”), the probably will need some money to get to the next level.  We’re now in that zone – where the rapid prototypes have flooded the market – and the companies that emerge will actually need to build out infrastructure (that costs money), a team (that costs money), a salesforce or channel (that costs money), deeper technical capability to scale the business (that costs money), and so on.  Fortunately, this time around, most rational people realize that it doesn’t take $75m to build a web-based software company – the number is more like $15m – $25m.  So – the money is spent slower and more intelligently in the success cases.
 
If that’s the case, how do you spend that money? What can work to help you stand out? (Examples would be great).  “Build it and they will come” happens rarely (e.g. Youtube).  However, when they come, you’ve got to put together a bunch of infrastructure and that costs money.  Most of the money is being spent on three things: (1) distribution, (2) engineering, and (3) infrastructure.  Distribution is the tricky one – it’s a combination of marketing, sales, and business development and you’ve got to get the mix right.  Many early stage companies don’t really know who their customer is, what their channel is, or how they are going to get to it, so the spend here is inefficient.
 
What lessons can be learned from the companies that are getting wound down? If you aren’t going to make it, take your medicine gracefully and move on.  Life is long and most successful entrepreneurs (and investors) have plenty of failures in their past. 
 
Are any companies you’re involved with going through this? Not right now, but it’s inevitable that some will.
 
Do you expect more companies shut down either soon or later this year? What kind of companies? (IE are there areas where there simply are too many companies?)  I think there will be a steady stream of failures.  That’s normal and should be no surprise to anyone.

  • http://wantsy.blogspot.com Robert Dewey

    Interesting thoughts. My opinion is that funding shouldn’t be needed until the startup has to scale. At that point, you obviously have a proven concept, customers, and everything else to support a potentially profitable business.

    “Since I only do interviews by email”

    That ensures there’s a solid record of what’s said :)

  • David

    “Since I only do interviews by email”

    Do you also ask for 3 bottles of Evian at 2 degrees below room temp in your dressing room?

    Just busting your balls man…actually the only reason I caught it was because I think I discovered your blog through a (non-email apparently) interview you did about running.

  • http://www.feld.com Brad Feld

    Actually I prefer my bottled water warm. And – I won’t drink French bottled water unless it’s Perrier except when I’m in Mexico, in which case I prefer chilled Evian.

  • sigma

    Brad,

    Your interview was good.

    After reading your interview, I read the article “Make-or-Break Time For The Net Newbies”.

    There is an example here, at least for me, and maybe for some others:

    I like your blog and read it. I don’t like ‘BusinessWeek’ and mostly don’t read it. For an example of why, I liked your interview and did not like the article.

    Your interview was informative.

    The article seemed to have a special goal of trying to entertain the reader by creating for them a vicarious escapist fantasy experience (VEFE), in this case, letting people who regard themselves as in the “real world” of main street US business and not pursuing Web 2.0 companies feel good that they are one up on the “net newbies” of Web 2.0 companies as they struggle with “the real world”.

    Yesterday read a little of G. Soros and his idea about “far from equilibrium” situations. For me, what ‘BusinessWeek’, along with much of the media, is doing with VEFE goals instead of being informative is an example of the Soros idea.

    If your blog can beat ‘BusinessWeek’, and for me it does overwhelmingly, then maybe media content is in for a big change. For this I am not holding my breath, taking short positions, or expecting big results this year, but it does appear that maybe, finally the media’s far from reality and “far from equilibrium” compulsion of ‘drama’ and VEFE is due for a fall.

  • http://ulik.typepad.com/leafar/in_english/index.html leafar

    Scaling Myspace … an article from Greg linden

    http://glinden.blogspot.com/2007/01/scaling-myspace.html

    great post.

  • http://blog.softwareabstractions.com NItinK

    Brad:

    Great interview! I was just writing about this – the feature threshold is rising for new Web 2.0 services that are coming to the market now. The very early startups in this particular “fishing hole” could get away with a minimal approach when the concepts of tagging, social networks, collective intelligence, et al were new.

    Good to see that this change is getting more attention!

Build something great with me