Comments on: Please Don’t Let Them Call It Web 3.0

By: StoryOnVideo.com

StoryOnVideo.com — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:04:13 +0000

Web2007 version?! can u tell me more about that..sounds interesting…thanks.
Me,
StoryOnVideo

By: Richard

Richard — Fri, 17 Nov 2006 05:12:50 +0000

They are interesting stuff. Some guys like to use fashion words to attract eyeballs. As long as they can illustrate the essential points, let it be.

I use Security 2.0 to describe the new trends in network security area, e.g. internal control, identity and access management, and etc. That differentiate themselves from the original anti-virus plus firewall plus IDS. No matter what you call them, they just exist there. right?

By: Dave Jilk

Dave Jilk — Tue, 14 Nov 2006 21:06:45 +0000

Are they going to upgrade the Series of Tubes in Web 3.0? Because then I’m all for it.

By: Tom Walker

Tom Walker — Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:32:25 +0000

I’ve been talking about this topic for a while now with my friend Greg Reinacker. Unless you are at the cutting edge of webdev, or, like yourself, a leading edge investor, Web 2.0 is a meaningless term. To the average user (and I’ll lump myself in there, since although I am a very tech-savvy, high-end PC user, I only know what AJAX is via my NewsGator friends) the web is an evolving thing. Every now and then something new comes along on a site you may have visited many times before, and you say “hey that’s sorta neat”. But there has been no revolution on this end. And the whole Office 2.0 concept seems to me to be a solution looking for a problem. The bottom line is that the whole x.0 concept is a sort of inside joke. Down the road these leading edge guys will be able to say “hey I was part of that Web 2.0 thing” and their friend will say “what are you talking about?”. On their wristwatch global personal communicator, of course.

By: Charlie

Charlie — Tue, 14 Nov 2006 15:59:05 +0000

There’s always “Web Two-Point-Uh-Oh”