<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Intelligence Amplification</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/11/more-on-intelligence-amplification.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/11/more-on-intelligence-amplification.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Feld</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/11/more-on-intelligence-amplification.html/comment-page-1#comment-3954</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Feld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1400#comment-3954</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just hoping that Intelligence Amplification catches on and get shortened to IA.  Then it&#039;ll be a really nice play on AI.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just hoping that Intelligence Amplification catches on and get shortened to IA.  Then it&#8217;ll be a really nice play on AI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Wolters</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/11/more-on-intelligence-amplification.html/comment-page-1#comment-3953</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Wolters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=1400#comment-3953</guid>
		<description>Intelligence Amplification is too long.  It also is not necessarily amplifying intelligence.  In many cases it amplifies stupidity.   Web 3.0 doesn&#039;t say what it is but easily rolls off the tongue.  Creating Passionate Users&#039; blog has a great &lt;a href=&quot;http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2006/11/why_web_20_is_m.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post &lt;/a&gt; on the diff between buzz and jargon that defends the 2.0 - 3.0 moniker.  1.0 to 2.0 was fairly revolutionary going from mouthpiece to participatory.  I think 3.0 just extends the goals of 2.0.

I&#039;m certainly not sold on 3.0 so here are a few others I&#039;ll throw into the ring.

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Community Think&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;iWeb or Interactive Web&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Quorum&lt;li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Rant&lt;li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Second Life ... hmmm that one&#039;s taken ;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;WiQ or Web IQ&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intelligence Amplification is too long.  It also is not necessarily amplifying intelligence.  In many cases it amplifies stupidity.   Web 3.0 doesn&#8217;t say what it is but easily rolls off the tongue.  Creating Passionate Users&#8217; blog has a great <a href="http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2006/11/why_web_20_is_m.html" rel="nofollow">post </a> on the diff between buzz and jargon that defends the 2.0 &#8211; 3.0 moniker.  1.0 to 2.0 was fairly revolutionary going from mouthpiece to participatory.  I think 3.0 just extends the goals of 2.0.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly not sold on 3.0 so here are a few others I&#8217;ll throw into the ring.</p>
<ul>
<li>Community Think</li>
<li>iWeb or Interactive Web</li>
<li>Quorum</li>
<li>
</li>
<li>Rant</li>
<li>
</li>
<li>Second Life &#8230; hmmm that one&#8217;s taken <img src='http://www.feld.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </li>
<li>WiQ or Web IQ</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache 0.8.9.1 -->
