I also wanted to mention that I have a 61 year old roommate that went to Nam. The government just caught up with him on his 2400 dollar GIbill Loan that has now turned into 15,000. He has PTSD like most veterans and has had a rough life. Any ideas?

Fred

If Coach stole (via force or fraud) the property of victims A,B, and C, then only A,B and C have a just claim against Coach in the amount of their losses, plus recovery expenses. They have every right to hire an enforcement agency to recover these losses through Coach’s assets or future income.

In this case, the prosecutor “P”, enters the scene to punish Coach. He claims to represent A,B and C, but actually represents the state (and his own political aspirations – see Spitzer) whose interests are often adverse to the victim’s. Putting the man behind bars for 12 years completely eliminates any chance for him to repay his victims, and worse, the victims are forced to pay bear the costs (probably north of $1.2MM) for their theif’s upkeep for the next 12 years (along with the other local taxpayers).

Hardly what I would call “justice,” were I a victim of Coach’s actions.

If Coach stole (via force or fraud) the property of victims A,B, and C, then only A,B and C have a just claim against Coach in the amount of their losses, plus recovery expenses. They have every right to hire an enforcement agency to recover these losses through Coach's assets or future income.

In this case, the prosecutor "P", enters the scene to punish Coach. He claims to represent A,B and C, but actually represents the state (and his own political aspirations – see Spitzer) whose interests are often adverse to the victim's. Putting the man behind bars for 12 years completely eliminates any chance for him to repay his victims, and worse, the victims are forced to pay bear the costs (probably north of $1.2MM) for their theif's upkeep for the next 12 years (along with the other local taxpayers).

Hardly what I would call "justice," were I a victim of Coach's actions.

Instead of affording him some way of paying his debt to society in an active way, he’s going to sit in a cell, doing nothing but suffering and counting time.

Everyone loses.

Coach never did pay for the website, he left me holding the bag and I of course had to pay all of the team members out of my own pocket. Coach was a very good manipulator and strung me along for months thinking I’d actually get paid. Ended up taking him to court (he didn’t bother to show up to that nice looking Boulder County Court House for our hearing) and even after winning a judgement against him – never got much in the form of pay back.

Had he not been referred to me by a good friend (a mutual friend of ours) I probably would have not been so eager to please and do such a good job. He used my website for months and never did pay for it – and constantly made me feel as though I were the bad guy for hassling him for payment over and over again.

Anyway, what I’m getting at is that there were two sides to this guy, you didn’t get to view the side I did. I don’t have much remorse for Mr. Coach, I hope that he spends the next 12 years thinking about all the little people like me whom he bilked that will get no rembursement.

Dean Rizzuto

I spent a couple days in that building in the 1980′s. An overused phrase – “CHANGED MY LIFE”.

I know it wasn’t the point of your story, but I’ll say it anyway, Nothing like a night in overcrowded jail to scare a middle class teenager back on track.

And to Rob, all crimes have a victim…there is no such thing as “victimless crime” in a democracy. Prison has historically two purposes, punishment and deterrent, it now also has the purpose of rehab and unfortunately, containment. It sounds like deterrent didn’t work for Coach, it also sounds like rehab is working, and now punishment takes over.

I will agree with Allan that sentencing is often out of proportion to the crime itself.

When you reduce it to the personal level, it is not good for Coach, but he was responsible for his actions and personal responsibility is something many in America need to learn again.

Thanks for a thought-provoking and thoughtful article, which illuminated for some the twisty paths which have developed in the American judicial system.

The slogan which runs “If you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime!” works for me here in England as well as it does in Boulder! The question asked of the jury was, “Was this guy guilty?”; and the answer was “Yes!” So the Coach was then slung on the pile of decisions left for the judge, who has been deputed by society to make these decisions on its’ behalf.

I understand that you knew the guy pretty well when you were younger, but people do change, and the stand-up guy whom you knew is possibly no longer around!

Best of luck to you and to Amy, for as long as there are people such as yourselves who will stand up and state that this guy is not all bad, America will still stand tall in the eyes of many around the world!