Comments on: Entity Conversions In Delaware Just Got Easier http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/03/entity-conversions-in-delaware-just-got-easier.html Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:23:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Stake Ventures http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/03/entity-conversions-in-delaware-just-got-easier.html/comment-page-1#comment-2543 Stake Ventures Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:53:57 +0000 http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=940#comment-2543 <strong>Final VC objection to LLC's gone</strong> Great news for people wishing to startup in an agile way and possibly seek funding later. Feld Thoughts has discovered new Delaware legislation making it easy to convert an out of state LLC to a Delaware Inc. Delaware Inc Final VC objection to LLC’s gone

Great news for people wishing to startup in an agile way and possibly seek funding later. Feld Thoughts has discovered new Delaware legislation making it easy to convert an out of state LLC to a Delaware Inc. Delaware Inc

]]> By: Jack Krupansky http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/03/entity-conversions-in-delaware-just-got-easier.html/comment-page-1#comment-2542 Jack Krupansky Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:40:37 +0000 http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=940#comment-2542 I liked the original title. It gave the post a Web 2.0 feel. Hopefully a future post will discuss the potential that Web 2.0 has for enabling "entity conversations". -- Jack Krupansky I liked the original title. It gave the post a Web 2.0 feel.

Hopefully a future post will discuss the potential that Web 2.0 has for enabling “entity conversations”.

– Jack Krupansky

]]> By: Brad Feld http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/03/entity-conversions-in-delaware-just-got-easier.html/comment-page-1#comment-2541 Brad Feld Sun, 19 Mar 2006 04:33:44 +0000 http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=940#comment-2541 Oops - fixed. Thanks. Oops – fixed. Thanks.

]]> By: Artem http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/03/entity-conversions-in-delaware-just-got-easier.html/comment-page-1#comment-2540 Artem Sun, 19 Mar 2006 00:40:15 +0000 http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=940#comment-2540 Probably you meant "conversions", not "conversations". Or is it a word play I do not get? Probably you meant “conversions”, not “conversations”. Or is it a word play I do not get?

]]>