« swipe left for tags/categories
swipe right to go back »
Jason and I have mentioned accredited investors several times in various postings on this blog. However, after I received the following question, I realized we had never talked about why non-accredited investors are an issue for a company. The question I received follows:
Do you have any stories or insight into the dangers of non-accredited investors? I’m currently attempting to work out a messy deal where some of the original (and potentially very unhappy) investors come in all flavors – sophisticated and accredited, unsophisticated and accredited, sophisticated and unaccredited, and of course, unsophisticated and unaccredited. I’d love to see a post on the subject in your blog, should you have the insight and interest.
For those of you that don’t know what an accredited investor is, the SEC provides a very clear definition. In general, unaccredited investors can pose a number of problems. You’ll have to ask your lawyer for the nitty gritty, but we’ll cover the three major points in this post.
First, have you done a proper private placement? One has to jump through many more hoops to sell securities to unaccredited investors. Many times, what appears to have been done correctly, later turns out to have been done poorly or incorrectly. This is particularly troubling because at any time, these unaccredited investors have the right to rescind their investment in the company. This is a ticking time bomb that can explode, especially if the company is underperforming. It’s a very dangerous thing to have investors around that can unravel a deal with 20/20 hindsight. Let’s assume, however that your lawyers got it right, which leads us to the next issue.
What happens on an acquisition? Regardless if the placement was done correctly to the unaccredited investors, an acquisition of the company could pose big problems. Take the case where a private company acquires the company for stock. Handling the unaccredited investors can be extremely difficult. The unaccredited investors need a purchase representative to trade their stock for the acquiring company stock, or the stock needs to be registered or subject to fairness hearings. Alternatively, the buyer will insist that they don’t want unaccredited investors holding stock in their company, in which case the seller needs to come up with cash to buy out the unaccredited investors. We’ve seen cases where the buyer completely refused to deal with the unaccredited investors and the accredited investors on the seller’s side had to invest new cash in the company to buy out the unaccredited investors. Public company acquisitions can present similar problems if the stock being issued in the acquisition is not registered. Basically, your garden variety mess.
Finally by nature, unaccredited investors are generally unsophisticated. This might be the most concerning issue of having unaccredited investors into your company. By nature, they are less experienced in these types of investments and have less money to invest than others. What you normally get are more skittish investors whose emotions rise and fall with every piece of good or bad news from the company. When things turn bad, “unsophisticated investors” – who often didn’t realize that they could lose 100% of their investor – become irrational or hostile, in an already difficult situation for the company (i.e. the company is failing.)
Now – just because an investor is accredited doesn’t mean he is sophisticated. The basic message is always the same – know who your investors are and what their past behavior has been like, especially in difficult circumstances. However, especially in early stage companies, try to insure that all of your investors are accredited and – if some aren’t – that your lawyer has done a proper private placement to eliminate any issues associated with the actual financing.