<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judy&#8217;s Facelift</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/02/judys-facelift.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/02/judys-facelift.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:16:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Feld</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/02/judys-facelift.html/comment-page-1#comment-2392</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Feld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=893#comment-2392</guid>
		<description>Eric - here&#039;s a comment from Chris DeVore - one of the co-founders of Judy&#039;s Book - after I asked him about your issue.

Merchant rebuttals to consumer reviews are the #1-with-a-bullet feature request from the merchant team.  Don&#039;t have a ship date yet, but business &amp; technical design is underway.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric &#8211; here&#8217;s a comment from Chris DeVore &#8211; one of the co-founders of Judy&#8217;s Book &#8211; after I asked him about your issue.</p>
<p>Merchant rebuttals to consumer reviews are the #1-with-a-bullet feature request from the merchant team.  Don&#8217;t have a ship date yet, but business &#038; technical design is underway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/02/judys-facelift.html/comment-page-1#comment-2391</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=893#comment-2391</guid>
		<description>Here is what I don&#039;t understand. If I am a small business and I get some jack$$$ customer that comes in wants the special which is a sandwich, but wants a different sandwich and wants a shake instead of a malt,etc. and I tell her no and she comes on the site and badmouths my business. Do I get a chance to defend myself? I&#039;m just worried about customers holding small businsses hostage with sites like this.

Just a comment.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is what I don&#8217;t understand. If I am a small business and I get some jack$$$ customer that comes in wants the special which is a sandwich, but wants a different sandwich and wants a shake instead of a malt,etc. and I tell her no and she comes on the site and badmouths my business. Do I get a chance to defend myself? I&#8217;m just worried about customers holding small businsses hostage with sites like this.</p>
<p>Just a comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmadler</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/02/judys-facelift.html/comment-page-1#comment-2390</link>
		<dc:creator>cmadler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=893#comment-2390</guid>
		<description>I am relatively indifferent to the new look, but I continue to be dissatisfied with the Judy&#039;s Book categorization. I frequently find miscategorized entries (ex. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.judysbook.com/cities/annarbor/Restaurants/67902/p1/Stucchi_s_Ice_Cream.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stucci&#039;s Ice Cream&lt;/a&gt; - obviously an ice cream shop, is under &quot;Restaurants&quot; rather than the more appropriate &quot;Ice Cream and Frozen Yogurt&quot; or &quot;Ice Cream and Frozen Desserts.&quot; I have submitted feedback to Judy&#039;s Book regarding this and other similar errors (a restaurant listed in &quot;Miscellaneous&quot;) but have only recieved automated responses and the listings have not been corrected. I suggest two solutions to the problem of categorization. First, there should be some mechanism for user-driven categorization. This might be subjected to approval by a Judy&#039;s Book staffer or by other users (&quot;It has been suggested that this listing should be categorized in X. Do you agree or disagree?&quot;). Second, in such a database, there is no need for each listing to be limited to just one category, if more than one is appropriate. In the above example, Stucci&#039;s Ice Cream could be listed in both &quot;Ice Cream and Frozen Yogurt&quot; and &quot;Ice Cream and Frozen Desserts,&quot; as well as (less intuitively, and therefore more helpful to users) &quot;Soup.&quot;

Another area in which I have noticed large potential for improvement is in chains. There should be some relation between (for example) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.judysbook.com/cities/annarbor/Restaurants/74099/p1/Le_Dog.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Le Dog&lt;/a&gt; on Liberty St in Ann Arbor, MI, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.judysbook.com/cities/annarbor/Restaurants/14141798/p1/Le_Dog.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Le Dog&lt;/a&gt; on Main St in Ann Arbor, especially when (as often seems to be the case) one location of the chain is reviewed and others are not.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am relatively indifferent to the new look, but I continue to be dissatisfied with the Judy&#8217;s Book categorization. I frequently find miscategorized entries (ex. <a href="http://www.judysbook.com/cities/annarbor/Restaurants/67902/p1/Stucchi_s_Ice_Cream.htm" rel="nofollow">Stucci&#8217;s Ice Cream</a> &#8211; obviously an ice cream shop, is under &#8220;Restaurants&#8221; rather than the more appropriate &#8220;Ice Cream and Frozen Yogurt&#8221; or &#8220;Ice Cream and Frozen Desserts.&#8221; I have submitted feedback to Judy&#8217;s Book regarding this and other similar errors (a restaurant listed in &#8220;Miscellaneous&#8221;) but have only recieved automated responses and the listings have not been corrected. I suggest two solutions to the problem of categorization. First, there should be some mechanism for user-driven categorization. This might be subjected to approval by a Judy&#8217;s Book staffer or by other users (&#8220;It has been suggested that this listing should be categorized in X. Do you agree or disagree?&#8221;). Second, in such a database, there is no need for each listing to be limited to just one category, if more than one is appropriate. In the above example, Stucci&#8217;s Ice Cream could be listed in both &#8220;Ice Cream and Frozen Yogurt&#8221; and &#8220;Ice Cream and Frozen Desserts,&#8221; as well as (less intuitively, and therefore more helpful to users) &#8220;Soup.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another area in which I have noticed large potential for improvement is in chains. There should be some relation between (for example) <a href="http://www.judysbook.com/cities/annarbor/Restaurants/74099/p1/Le_Dog.htm" rel="nofollow">Le Dog</a> on Liberty St in Ann Arbor, MI, and <a href="http://www.judysbook.com/cities/annarbor/Restaurants/14141798/p1/Le_Dog.htm" rel="nofollow">Le Dog</a> on Main St in Ann Arbor, especially when (as often seems to be the case) one location of the chain is reviewed and others are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmycui001</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/02/judys-facelift.html/comment-page-1#comment-2393</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmycui001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=893#comment-2393</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;【他们说】和菜头：霍元甲二三事&lt;/strong&gt;


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>【他们说】和菜头：霍元甲二三事</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chithra Durgam</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/02/judys-facelift.html/comment-page-1#comment-2389</link>
		<dc:creator>Chithra Durgam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=893#comment-2389</guid>
		<description>I like Judy&#039;s Book and I was first introduced to it through this blog. It would be great to get the Chamber of Commerce of different cities to promote it. Through grassroots promotion it could be even more successful.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Judy&#8217;s Book and I was first introduced to it through this blog. It would be great to get the Chamber of Commerce of different cities to promote it. Through grassroots promotion it could be even more successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chithra Durgam</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/02/judys-facelift.html/comment-page-1#comment-2388</link>
		<dc:creator>Chithra Durgam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=893#comment-2388</guid>
		<description>I like Judy&#039;s Book and I was first introduced to it through this blog. It would be great to get the Chamber of Commerce of different cities to promote it. Through grassroots promotion it could be even more successful.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Judy&#8217;s Book and I was first introduced to it through this blog. It would be great to get the Chamber of Commerce of different cities to promote it. Through grassroots promotion it could be even more successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj Bala</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2006/02/judys-facelift.html/comment-page-1#comment-2387</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj Bala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 01:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=893#comment-2387</guid>
		<description>I like the new look.  Besides the new stuff, I have always liked the way that I didn&#039;t have too much work to write a review --- other than the review itself.

Riffs was cool --- until I had to find and upload images myself to write a decent review.  That got really old.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new look.  Besides the new stuff, I have always liked the way that I didn&#8217;t have too much work to write a review &#8212; other than the review itself.</p>
<p>Riffs was cool &#8212; until I had to find and upload images myself to write a decent review.  That got really old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache 0.8.9.1 -->
