<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSS is Plumbing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2005/11/rss-is-plumbing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2005/11/rss-is-plumbing.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ruchit Garg</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2005/11/rss-is-plumbing.html/comment-page-1#comment-1739</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruchit Garg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 07:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=650#comment-1739</guid>
		<description>Its sure to happen. People have started recognising RSS, feed-reader and all....slowly that would be as common as the term &#039;email&#039;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its sure to happen. People have started recognising RSS, feed-reader and all&#8230;.slowly that would be as common as the term &#8216;email&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Jilk</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2005/11/rss-is-plumbing.html/comment-page-1#comment-1738</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Jilk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 22:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=650#comment-1738</guid>
		<description>The only problem with this is that &quot;plumbing&quot; in software is roughly the same as &quot;commodity.&quot;  Although Microsoft managed to have its plumbing treated as a utility, anything based on open standards that is plumbing can be developed by anyone, typically has open source alternatives, and eventually just gets &quot;vertically integrated&quot; into other products.  So the question arises, &quot;how do you make money from it, when it&#039;s plumbing?&quot;

Note that no one is making money from selling SMTP software.  Sure, people have built services to deliver email using SMTP, but the delivery aspect (as I believe you recall from MESG) is an unprofitable commodity - it&#039;s the service component that makes money.  Sure, Microsoft makes money on Outlook, but that&#039;s precisely because Outlook is an integrated package, and is NOT a commodity.  THe SMTP part is just a hidden, unremarkable component that you can get for free in any number of Apache-licensed libraries.

This is why in a comment a while back I pointed out on Seth&#039;s blog that *standards* and *technologies* are very different things.  Technologies have proprietary value; standards are very difficult to make money from.  RSS is not a technology, and its ubiquity will make it HARDER rather than easier to make money.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem with this is that &#8220;plumbing&#8221; in software is roughly the same as &#8220;commodity.&#8221;  Although Microsoft managed to have its plumbing treated as a utility, anything based on open standards that is plumbing can be developed by anyone, typically has open source alternatives, and eventually just gets &#8220;vertically integrated&#8221; into other products.  So the question arises, &#8220;how do you make money from it, when it&#8217;s plumbing?&#8221;</p>
<p>Note that no one is making money from selling SMTP software.  Sure, people have built services to deliver email using SMTP, but the delivery aspect (as I believe you recall from MESG) is an unprofitable commodity &#8211; it&#8217;s the service component that makes money.  Sure, Microsoft makes money on Outlook, but that&#8217;s precisely because Outlook is an integrated package, and is NOT a commodity.  THe SMTP part is just a hidden, unremarkable component that you can get for free in any number of Apache-licensed libraries.</p>
<p>This is why in a comment a while back I pointed out on Seth&#8217;s blog that *standards* and *technologies* are very different things.  Technologies have proprietary value; standards are very difficult to make money from.  RSS is not a technology, and its ubiquity will make it HARDER rather than easier to make money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Moody</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2005/11/rss-is-plumbing.html/comment-page-1#comment-1737</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Moody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 07:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=650#comment-1737</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m reminded of commercials from the 50s and 60s touting the benefits of electricity.  Here&#039;s an example (RealMedia):

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tvparty.com/g2c/electricall00.ram&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.tvparty.com/g2c/electricall00.ram&lt;/a&gt;

I seldom (if ever) use the word &quot;electricity&quot; or &quot;electric power.&quot;  Things are either plugged-in or they&#039;re not.  I expect the same thing will happen with RSS one day soon.  - Scott

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reminded of commercials from the 50s and 60s touting the benefits of electricity.  Here&#8217;s an example (RealMedia):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tvparty.com/g2c/electricall00.ram" rel="nofollow">http://www.tvparty.com/g2c/electricall00.ram</a></p>
<p>I seldom (if ever) use the word &#8220;electricity&#8221; or &#8220;electric power.&#8221;  Things are either plugged-in or they&#8217;re not.  I expect the same thing will happen with RSS one day soon.  &#8211; Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
