<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NewsGator News and Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2004/09/newsgator-news-and-name.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2004/09/newsgator-news-and-name.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:10:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Len VT</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2004/09/newsgator-news-and-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Len VT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 16:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=155#comment-354</guid>
		<description>I posted over at Greg Reinacker&#039;s blog but as a Product Marketer I&#039;ve got to say that the decision to change a brand or a company name for an established company is a difficult one, I would always lean towards not changing the name.

Look at what happened when HP spun off their instruments group (I know it&#039;s a bit of a different situation than yours) into the newly named Agilent Technologies.  They&#039;re still struggling with that name change.  What changes like these do is confuse customers.

Then again it can work to a company&#039;s favor as in the case when Andersen Consulting changed their name to Accenture just before the Arthur Andersen/Enron accounting debacle.  But that was just luck ...


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted over at Greg Reinacker&#8217;s blog but as a Product Marketer I&#8217;ve got to say that the decision to change a brand or a company name for an established company is a difficult one, I would always lean towards not changing the name.</p>
<p>Look at what happened when HP spun off their instruments group (I know it&#8217;s a bit of a different situation than yours) into the newly named Agilent Technologies.  They&#8217;re still struggling with that name change.  What changes like these do is confuse customers.</p>
<p>Then again it can work to a company&#8217;s favor as in the case when Andersen Consulting changed their name to Accenture just before the Arthur Andersen/Enron accounting debacle.  But that was just luck &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Software Only</title>
		<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2004/09/newsgator-news-and-name.html/comment-page-1#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Software Only</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2004 05:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.feld.com/wp/?p=155#comment-355</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Should NewsGator change its name because of a potential &quot;Gator&quot; association? Not sure...&lt;/strong&gt;

Greg Reinacker, the CEO of NewsGator, is asking feedback as to whether the &quot;Gator&quot; connotation is negatively impacting the image of his business, and whether he should consider changing the name of his company. As too many of us already
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Should NewsGator change its name because of a potential &#8220;Gator&#8221; association? Not sure&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Greg Reinacker, the CEO of NewsGator, is asking feedback as to whether the &#8220;Gator&#8221; connotation is negatively impacting the image of his business, and whether he should consider changing the name of his company. As too many of us already</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
