### « swipe left for tags/categories

### swipe right to go back »

Every year in December and January I go through the same cycle for all the boards I’m on. It’s the annual bonus, next year bonus plan, option grant refresh cycle. For many management teams, especially in rapidly growing, or mature companies, it’s an important part of their existence as culturally we’ve oriented compensation, bonuses, and future compensation around an annual cycle.

I embrace this – my goal is to help these entrepreneurs and management teams win. I know compensation is an important part of the feedback / reward loop. While I’ve occasionally had conflict over compensation, and I’ve had a few CEOs I work with tell me they feel like it’s an uncomfortable discussion, my own perception of my behavior is that I’m a softy. If things are going well, I am supportive of anything that’s reasonable. And, having thousands of data points over the past 17 years, I’ve got a good calibration on reasonable.

One thing, however, has always baffled me. *I’ve never really understood why the majority of stock option refresh grants are stacked grants mid-way through the granting process. *

Let me give an example. Assume you hire someone and grant them 10,000 options with monthly vesting of four years with a one year cliff. That means that after one year, they get 25% of their options and then start vesting the remaining options monthly at a rate of 1/48 (208.3 options / month, or 2,500 / year.) On day 1 of year 3, the person has vested 50% of their options, or 5,000 of them and still has 5,000 left to vest. This person is doing great so management puts them in the annual option refresh cycle. Now, the company has increased in value, as has the option strike price, so the refresh grant is determined to be 25% of the original grant – or 2,500 options vesting monthly over four years, or 625 options per year.

Now, in year 3 the employee in question vests a total of 3,125 options, in year 4 they vest a total of 3,125 options, in year 5 they now vest 625 options, and in year 6 they vest 625 options. This makes no sense to me. You just changed their first four year vesting package from 10,000 options to 11,250 options (2,812.5 options per year) and then left them with 625 in years 5 and 6. *This is a bonus in years 3 and 4 and a refresh in years 5 and 6.*

Instead, why not grant them the new 2,500 options that vest in two years – 50% in year 5 and 50% in year 6. So now, they once again have 2,500 options per year for years 1 to 4 and 1,250 options vesting in years 5 and 6. *This is a refresh in years 5 and 6.*

The key difference is you are separating the “refresh grant” from a bonus, or retrading, of the hire grant. Now, I’m totally supportive of giving people bonus grants – if someone is doing an awesome job and they deserve more options in year 3 and year 4, do that. But that’s separate from a refresh, especially if your goal is to make sure there is always plenty of future options vesting.

The reason companies do the refresh in year 3 instead of year 5 is that – assuming success – the strike price of the option in year 3 will be lower. So the “value” of the option theoretically is higher if you grant it earlier since you get to lock in a lower strike price, especially against the uncertainty of where the strike price will be in two years. So that’s perfectly rational, but the idea of stacking the refresh grant on the old grant is not.

I’m not pushing to implement this in 2013 since I’m at the tail end of the refresh cycle with many of the companies I’m an investor in and just recently realized why the way refresh grants historically have been done didn’t make sense to me. And it shouldn’t make sense to the management team either – their goal and my goal is aligned – get plenty of future option value locked via vesting as a reward and retention tool.

**I’m open to hearing why this doesn’t make sense. I just read it again and realize it’s confusing, as is almost every conversation I have with a management team around what, how, and why they are refreshing options. So – tell me what you do – and why – as I try to make this explanation / approach simpler.**

Pingback: Future Options Trading

Pingback: xbox 360

Pingback: penisadvantage

Pingback: Dillon Kuhnen

Pingback: Cary Sleaford

Pingback: Roxy Goldtooth

Pingback: Burt Rochell

Pingback: Kraig Gearon

Pingback: Michal Liukko

Pingback: Marvin Loewenstein

Pingback: Marcus Botdorf

Pingback: Tamica Sebold

Pingback: Stefany Eberth

Pingback: Kareem Henton

Pingback: Sherry Sees

Pingback: tao of badass

Pingback: Vanetta Daiz

Pingback: In Silva

Pingback: Pat Fraser

Pingback: Delphine Santangelo

Pingback: Roy Hequembourg

Pingback: Carolann Meehleder

Pingback: Sam Wollmer

Pingback: Gene Rought

Pingback: Lynn Repenning

Pingback: Noel Demman

Pingback: Earnest Shock

Pingback: Charlie Falterman

Pingback: Ivory Ionescu

Pingback: Stanley Tumbleston

Pingback: Ryan Digiorgio

Pingback: Florine Tatge

Pingback: Ruben Kravetsky

Pingback: Solomon Weathington

Pingback: Andrew Mcdermond

Pingback: Talitha Mlynek

Pingback: Fabiola Roquemore

Pingback: Cruz Kohnert

Pingback: Corrinne Malakan

Pingback: Mario Arguellez

Pingback: Jeffrey Stoskopf

Pingback: Corene Pinnock

Pingback: Titus Somdah

Pingback: Gretta Mach

Pingback: Carmelia Kuilan

Pingback: Nathanial Warrick

Pingback: Jamie Rynkowski

Pingback: Terrilyn Oganyan

Pingback: Lucio Conedy

Pingback: Herma Heckers

Pingback: Virgil Kiker

Pingback: Jackeline Burau

Pingback: Franchesca Lathem

Pingback: Zachary Deyon

Pingback: Dorothea Sedanos

Pingback: Bryan Ladick

Pingback: Allyn Carideo

Pingback: Jimmie Burkdoll

Pingback: Opal Arlington

Pingback: Farrah Blazek

Pingback: Ciera Gilcrest

Pingback: Sandy Cachu

Pingback: Fausto Benford

Pingback: Chong Garmon

Pingback: Kim Sanos

Pingback: Cyrus Preisendorf

Pingback: Regan Denfip

Pingback: Olga Kristin

Pingback: Dane Muckley

Pingback: Thaddeus Gehring

Pingback: Dwain Doose

Pingback: Owen Mignone

Pingback: cheap michigan auto insurance

Pingback: Wade Seaborn

Pingback: Oralia Stockhoff

Pingback: Deonna Ordway

Pingback: Irving Bubolz

Pingback: Benjamin Berkowitz

Pingback: Thomas Tuitt

Pingback: Melani Waltmon

Pingback: Doreen Bohall

Pingback: Eugenio Trifiletti

Pingback: Paz Mckechnie

Pingback: Ariel Gilcrease

Pingback: Jenine Baumberger

Pingback: Hunter Breault

Pingback: Leandro Williamsen

Pingback: Francesco Geiselman

Pingback: Elroy Agbisit

Pingback: Edmund Horras

Pingback: Breana Dugdale

Pingback: Lean Kuba

Pingback: Julissa Daugaard

Pingback: Rosanne Baldus

Pingback: Caryn Coulas

Pingback: Danae Mcghaney

Pingback: Van Fogo

Pingback: Alvina Cremeans

Pingback: Cordie Marinko

Pingback: Melanie Lajoie

Pingback: Megan Blankenbaker

Pingback: Al Robberson

Pingback: Chadwick Skutt

Pingback: Sarina Swires

Pingback: Elwanda Molineaux

Pingback: Maximo Bjorn

Pingback: Jerrold Frosch

Pingback: Jerrold Gritton

Pingback: Wayne Boglioli

Pingback: Sabrina Iamiceli

Pingback: Jolanda Dealmeida

Pingback: Emmett Dutton

Pingback: Domenic Monrow

Pingback: http://media.jefferson.k12.ky.us/groups/2008iflchoosingtherightstuff/wiki/25ee5/What_Every_one_Really_should_Find_out_about_the_Truth_about_Six_Pack_Abs.html

Pingback: http://204.234.22.33/groups/podcasts/wiki/0e975/Unlock_your_outstanding_songs_expertise_while_using_ideal_conquer_building_applications.html

Pingback: Zackary Rester

Pingback: Alycia Milsaps

Pingback: http://podcasting.jessamine.kyschools.us/groups/beerstechsupport/wiki/3fc66/What_Every_one_Ought_to_Find_out_about_the_Truth_about_Six_Pack_Abs.html

Pingback: Hayley Duberstein

Pingback: Mount Airy

Pingback: Jenae Sprouffske

Pingback: Rubi Sedillo

Pingback: Jeremiah Bastien

Pingback: Wayne Mcconnel

Pingback: Nathanial Camarena

Pingback: Willian Bournazian

Pingback: Alease Glew

Pingback: Bernardo Kenealy

Pingback: Ludivina Vollman

Pingback: Kirby Blacksher

Pingback: Nichol Agundez

Pingback: Lindsay Valerie

Pingback: Xochitl Sabado

Pingback: Zack Leet

Pingback: Denisse Yamaoka

Pingback: Kaycee Bechtold

Pingback: get cheap car insurance

Pingback: Willy Tauer

Pingback: Newton Raio

Pingback: Alia Duryee

Pingback: Jefferey Mattila

Pingback: Cicely Weary

Pingback: Dominic Santoscoy

Pingback: Broderick Vonfelden

Pingback: Waneta Boydstun

Pingback: Felipe Palmer

Pingback: Basil Larko

Pingback: Maragaret Challa

Pingback: Melani Crumrine

Pingback: Dena Hardigan

Pingback: Landon Bee

Pingback: Mary Pallansch

Pingback: Greta Stukenborg

Pingback: Jene Greth

Pingback: Carolina Sivertsen

Pingback: Danilo Belton

Pingback: Dinorah Felberbaum

Pingback: Chong Holets

Pingback: Kiera Nantanapibul

Pingback: Ellis Fehn

Pingback: Armand Coram

Pingback: Christoper Dandrea

Pingback: low cost auto insurance in michigan

Pingback: Mirta Decaneo

Pingback: Trent Hluska

Pingback: Bob Mccoggle

Pingback: Karl Cauthen

Pingback: Tonette Sanz