« swipe left for tags/categories
swipe right to go back »
I was at lunch last week with a friend and his business partner – my friend is an ex-technology VC who is now running an interesting blend of a public / private technology-focused hedge fund. Both my friend and his partner are technology savvy, reasonably current on what is going on, but focused more on the gap in public / private valuations (especially among small-cap tech companies) than on new software innovation.
After covering all the obvious stuff around SaaS, webapps, user-generated content, the consolidation of the enterprise software business, and the dramatic impact of broadband on consumer-based computing, we started talking about “what’s next.” As I described a number of the companies I’ve done seed / angel investments in the past year and what they are working on, my “new friend” (the business partner) started to rhymically nod his head (I’m going to assume it was out of comprehension, not boredom.) We started bouncing use cases around – especially around modifications of the stuff that currently exists today.
Not surprisingly, some of it was around the problem I’ve labeled (at least for myself) “dynamics of information.” These two guys are massive information junkies and have the same well described problem that I have – information is so broadly available that it regularly “swamps the boat.” It’s not just an issue of tuning the sources, or the filters, or what you pay attention to. Rather – it’s something much larger that takes into account the intersection of many of the technological themes - such as social networks, feeds, attention, user-generated content, identity, relevance, and a few other things tossed in for good measure. And – because of our friend Mr. Broadband – it now includes audio and video in addition to text.
As I was driving to my next meeting, I kept rolling around some of the ideas in my head. I thought about the new companies I was working with - along with the large number of things coming out of the release cycles of my existing companies – and felt there was a major software innovation wave coming. While it’s always a good time to be alive (I never really understood why someone would prefer the alternative), it especially seems exciting as we head into the tail end of 2006.