Impresses Me

Today had a set of major announcements around their AppExchange platform, including the release of the AppExchange OEM Edition.  One of my portfolio companies – Rally Software – participated in this with the launch of their Rally Agile Product Manager product as one of the first four AppExchange OEM partners.  Rally Agile Product Manager helps enable Agile Software Development via’s AppExchange.  If you are a customer, it’s live on the site.

The is the second time this year that a company that I’ve been involved in has worked closely with  In April, acquired Sendia, a company I was on the board of, and simultaneously announced their AppExchange Mobile service.  While the Sendia deal was only a modest positive outcome for us, it was a perfect fit with’s business and we decided to sell the company early in its life rather than continue to build the business.

In both cases, had a clear strategy, articulated it to the companies involved, and then deliberately executed on the strategy.  Each time, I was excited by the prospects but cautious because of all of the challenges I’ve historically experienced working with public software companies executing on the strategies they articulate.  In both cases, did an outstanding job of setting expectations and then executing on them – impressing me as a company that both has a clear strategy and the organizational will to follow through with it. 

Many of my portfolio companies have been long time customers – it’s gratifying to see several of them have successful partnerships with also.

  • Hey Brad,

    Since a bunch of your portfoilo companies are customers, and one of them is a RSS reader maker, and I run a service that lets users subscribe to with RSS… wait, where was I going with that? Oh yeah-maybe we should get them all using RSS with 🙂


  • Er, um, yeah! Let’s figure something out.

  • Just a thought: do you think there is a danger that will “see” the upside occuring for companies participating in AppExchange, and be able to buy them out before they really mature?

  • I don’t think that’s a large concern. I think most companies will welcome that dilemna. By controlling the platform, SFDC definitely has a window into the evolution of the AppExchange eco-system and that’s a hugely smart move on their part. However, I think it’s unlikely that they can “inappropriately” pick off the early successes – the companies making progress will have to want to be acquired and SFDC will have to meet whatever the rational clearing price is.

  • Mmmmm… just wondering if you thought that if there is really only one potential “buy out” on the horizon, then that “rational clearing price” is not determined by a real open market, therefore might participation in the appexchange might inappropriately limit the exit options for the start up?

  • While that risk exists, I think it’s a non issue. As the Salesforce community around AppExchange continues to grow, you should expect to see some established companies – especially those that are complimentary to the core Salesforce products (e.g. CRM) – start to participate in AppExchange. If / when this happens, there will be plenty of logical potential exits. For example, all the of the project management software providers should be paying attention to AppExchange and considering working with it. Several of these are large enough independent companies to be good exit choices for the younger AppExchange partners.

  • When salesforce aqcuires appexchange vendors, they start competing with the developers, and that is a bad strategy. If there are 2 appexchange vendors offering similar solutions, and buys one of them, how would the other one feel about it?

  • Pingback: cheap car insurance in san diego()

  • Pingback: i need cheap car insurance()

  • Pingback: car insurance comparison sites()